How to Publish in Nature Computational Science
There are a variety of ways to publish in Nature computational science. For example, you can publish your research using Open Access in Nature. This publication allows for peer review of non-primary articles. For more information, check out the journal’s Open Access policies. In addition, you can find metrics on the journal’s peer review turnaround times.
Open Access pathways permitted by Nature computational science
Open Access is the process of making scholarly works freely available to the public. It is the practice of many research institutions and universities to make these works freely available. Funding agencies are urging this trend, and many have already adopted mandatory open-access policies. The nature of scientific journals has also changed to accommodate open access.
Advances in computer technology have drastically changed the way researchers carry out research. Now, problems that once took years to solve can be solved in days, hours, or even seconds. This process is known as computational science, and it has fueled major scientific breakthroughs. With these advances, Nature Research has recently launched the journal Nature Computational Science.
The Journal offers a number of different Open Access pathways, which allow authors to publish their articles in either open or closed access journals. For journals with open access policies, authors can use form language to request an open access license. They may also opt to publish their articles on preprint servers. Nature Computational Science is committed to making open access available to all researchers, and is happy to assist with this process.
Code peer review
Code peer review is an important part of publishing in Nature Computational Science. When you are publishing a paper, you need to make sure that your code is reproducible and accurate. Ideally, your code is provided along with the corresponding input data. This way, the code and the input data can be checked for consistency. If they do not match, you can report this.
The Nature family of journals encourages researchers to submit custom-written software for peer review. To be considered for publication, a program should include source code and a README file listing the documentation. This makes it easier to share software and data, but it requires a peer reviewer to check the code for accuracy and consistency.
In 2014, Nature implemented a policy requiring authors to make their code available for use by readers. However, this is not always feasible or possible. For example, sometimes a supercomputer is required to run a complex analysis. In these cases, it might not be possible to share all the code. In these cases, editors and reviewers will decide how best to present the code.
CODECHECK is a practice that can be expanded to provide greater quality assurance. The process is designed to provide a low barrier to entry but can be further enhanced. The process can be customized based on the complexity of the research and the domain. For example, if a researcher uses open source software, they may be able to transition to a peer-review role in the future.
The peer review process for Nature Computational Science requires reviewers to view data and code before they make their decision. The journal’s editorial note explains the reviewers’ rights and responsibilities. The reviewers must also assess the strength of the analytical approach and the validity and comprehensiveness of statistical tests used in the analysis. If the analysis is out of their expertise, they should note that in the manuscript.
In addition to the above, Nature Cell Biology and Nature Neuroscience have also announced their own trials of open peer review. These journals encourage open peer review and try to make their process more efficient. Moreover, they strive for excellence. There are also blogs that complement the peer review process. The authors of both journals have a guide for authors who wish to publish their papers.
Non-primary articles not eligible for Open Access
One key issue that has led to the non-eligibility of Nature computational science non-primary articles for Open Access is the availability of data. Data must be made publicly available to support the conclusions of scientific publications. In recent years, many journals, including Nature, have begun implementing data availability rules. For example, Nature Biotechnology and Nature Cell Biology have recently announced new guidelines for providing data with articles. Authors should provide digital object identifiers (DOIs) for all data used in their research.
In addition to publishing articles in Open Access, Nature publishes a subset of its journal content that is not primary articles. This includes articles that contain code, mathematical algorithms, or software. Authors must make the code and software freely available to the public as part of the peer review process, and after publication. The journal provides detailed guidance for this process.
